• about the newsletter(s)
  • blog
  • computer help
  • contact
  • links
  • my socials
  • podcast
  • search
  • signup
  • tools

Search

Navigation

  • Newsletters
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home » blogs » jasonn's blog

Will Antivirus Companies Be Prosecuted for DMCA?

by jasonn | November 10, 2005 - 2:55pm

The logical question, regarding the Sony rootkit scandal and the upcoming removal tools from antivirus companies, is when will the DOJ prosecute antivirus companies for violating the DMCA? It's not a question of whether or not they violate the law when they supply removal tools for Sony's rootkit, aka Digital Rights Management software, which now exposes PCs to a virus threat. The question is whether or not the government will apply the law.

To violate the DMCA, you need only circumvent a digital process for protecting media files. No clarity is given in the code that tells the user they have any rights to protect themselves, their PC, or use the media they lawfully acquired. If, for example, Adobe requires you install software to stop you from duplicating your legally purchased eBook, then you must abide. Removing, hacking, or sidestepping is illegal under the DMCA.

Although the case against Russian programmer Dmitry Sklyarov was dropped, the fact remains that this law is unchallenged in the highest level of US courts to protect Americans and American companies from prosecution for doing with their own hardware and legally purchased software what they must to remain useful and safe. Fair use is mute.

... Dmitry Sklyarov was charged under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's circumvention 1201 clauses (one small part of which is under review by the Librarian of Congress) while visiting Las Vegas for a technical conference. Skylarov was imprisoned for his part in creating an Adobe eBook reader that permitted fair-use of copyright material, and imprisoned pending trial.

His case was dropped largely due to public outcry, partially for the guise of bigger fish fries as the DOJ set their sites on his employer, but in any event solved nothing for legal concerns and US citizenry.

The US DOJ would have you believe this law is good for enforcing copyright violations, mass duplication of illegally obtained material. And, it has been used to this end. However, the risk remains for any company or individual that help computer users to secure their own PCs from intrusive and dangerous commercial hackery.

Bookmark This
Close Bookmark and Share This Page
Save to Browser Favorites
Ask
backflip
blinklist
BlogBookmark
Bloglines
BlogMarks
Blogsvine
BuddyMarks
BUMPzee!
CiteULike
co.mments
Connotea
del.icio.us
Digg
diigo
DotNetKicks
DropJack
dzone
Facebook
Fark
Faves
Feed Me Links
Friendsite
folkd.com
Furl
Google
Hugg
Jamespot
Jeqq
Kaboodle
kirtsy
linkaGoGo
LinkedIn
LinksMarker
Ma.gnolia
Mister Wong
Mixx
MySpace
MyWeb
Netvouz
Newsvine
oneview
OnlyWire
PlugIM
Propeller
Reddit
Rojo
Segnalo
Shoutwire
Simpy
Slashdot
Sphere
Sphinn
Spurl
Squidoo
StumbleUpon
Technorati
ThisNext
Twitter
Webride
Windows Live
Worlds Movies
Yahoo!
Email This to a Friend
Copy HTML: 
 If you like this then please subscribe to the RSS Feed.
Powered by Bookmarkify™
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Furl] [Google] [StumbleUpon] [Twitter] [Email] More »
  • jasonn's blog
©2000-2009 Jason A. Nunnelley
rss feed / atom feed